sass / less

[soup]

Any plans on support for either ?

[kenjk12]

Yes! I 2nd that request.

[TopStyle Support]

I have no plans to support these. TopStyle 5 is all about standard CSS3 properties. I believe these technologies justify a different editor.

[soup]

ok, will say i think its a shame, and would disagree with you actually, as they are basically just variations of css
but can understand your point of view.

It might at least be worth considering supporting scss, as syntax highlighting, as its basically the same.

[soup]

to quote

SASS is simply an extension to existing CSS features

[TopStyle Support]

SASS is simply an extension to existing CSS features

I know, but the web browser does not understand SASS out-of-the-box. It requires the inclusion of a library.

TopStyle 5 is all about standards-compliant CSS3.

[Lou]

TopStyle 5 is all about standards-compliant CSS3.

That gets my vote.

[kenjk12]

I have no plans to support these.

Thanks for the answer.
I am very disappointed.

[SteelToad]

Not to beat a dead horse (people say that when it's exactly what they're about to do) but ...

It would be great if it were just supported for syntax highlighting, that way people using something like Scout or a similar tool would only need to save their scss file.

I totally get, and applaud, your adherence to standards, but darn it, I don't want to have to use anything but TopStyle

[crashT]

Hello, I need the LESS implementation and would be happy about it much.

[lionelts]

i was for less sass but seem there is so much to do with html css version completion.
There is a good article about not use less and sass relative to OO CSS .
I think sass and less could be usefull when the compiler ll be be directionnal css to sass and sass to css and it not he case .
i think topstyle could support less extension file and syntax but nothing else like compiler ...
regard' s