HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

For general web development questions that are not specifically related to CSS HTML Validator. This includes (but is not limited to) general HTML, CSS, Accessibility, JavaScript, and SEO questions.
Post Reply
User avatar
RSteinwand
Rank VI - Professional
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by RSteinwand »

Googles new protocol using UDP instead of TCP.

https://ma.ttias.be/googles-quic-protoc ... b-tcp-udp/
Rick
User avatar
Albert Wiersch
Site Admin
Posts: 3783
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
Location: Near Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by Albert Wiersch »

Thanks! That was a great read.

Now only if web developers don't find more ways to bloat up their pages and nullify the speed and bandwidth improvements of QUIC. :D
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial
User avatar
RSteinwand
Rank VI - Professional
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

Re: HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by RSteinwand »

This was part of Issue 6. You can view or signup here: https://perf.email/
Rick
User avatar
Albert Wiersch
Site Admin
Posts: 3783
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
Location: Near Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by Albert Wiersch »

Thanks.... only twice a month? I think I can handle that (make time for) so I signed up.
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial
User avatar
RSteinwand
Rank VI - Professional
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

Re: HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by RSteinwand »

But now you need to get caught up. :?
Rick
User avatar
MikeGale
Rank VI - Professional
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Tannhauser Gate

Re: HTTP/2 is too slow. Now we have QUIC.

Post by MikeGale »

Thanks for that.

That syn/ack triple handshake is clearly a problem.

Notes:
1. Wireshark (naturally) can handle QUIC packets.
2. The site has an RSS feed (implemented primitively) so you don't even need to sign up for email if you use feeds.
Post Reply