Which web browser is best?
- Albert Wiersch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3785
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
- Location: Near Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Re: Which web browser is best?
And yet another update...
Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 25, Firefox 19, And IE10
Looks like Chrome is best - best standards compliance and best performance, and Opera is lagging pretty far behind. Firefox was a close 2nd.
I will use Chrome more on my new Dell notebook because Firefox (my usual browser) displays the browsers tabs ridiculously large (double height I think). I don't know why and couldn't find a quick answer so it's a good excuse to use Chrome more.
Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 25, Firefox 19, And IE10
Looks like Chrome is best - best standards compliance and best performance, and Opera is lagging pretty far behind. Firefox was a close 2nd.
I will use Chrome more on my new Dell notebook because Firefox (my usual browser) displays the browsers tabs ridiculously large (double height I think). I don't know why and couldn't find a quick answer so it's a good excuse to use Chrome more.
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial
- MikeGale
- Rank VI - Professional
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
Re: Which web browser is best?
I've found a few issues with my latest checks.
I continue to use a variety of browsers. That includes various versions of IE. I find that web sites are getting worse. Some only work in IE, some don't. Some insist on FF / Chrome, some fail in one of those. Some give very different behaviour in different browsers. My presumption is that a fair number of developers are not working cross browser from the start. Maybe they've become used to "apps" so expect things not to be usable on many platforms. Pity they don't integrate decent web checking into their work flow!
I see Opera recently decided to drop development of their own browser engine and have adopted WebKit. The game is narrowing further!
- Chrome "phones home" more than I'd like. (Trace the conversation over HTTP, from it, and you can see what I mean. Some people don't mind, so it may not be a factor for you.) Though I haven't tested it much, I've noticed something called "Comodo Dragon" which is Chrome repackaged without the phone home tendency. If anybody else has tested this more thoroughly I'd appreciate feedback.
- I've found that Firefox 19 fails to operate on a fair number of sites. This is things like placing orders (I haven't seen the problem before). Normal traffic fine. This is disruptive, and seemingly quite common. (I have to stop working in FF and go to another browser.) Haven't researched that one. Last time I reported a bug to FF I found the experience unsatisfactory, though ultimately successful, so not inclined to do the work needed. FF also "phones home" more than I'd like, sometimes to Google services!. Again Comodo has a solution to that, "Ice Dragon" this time. Again not evaluated thoroughly, by me, yet.
I continue to use a variety of browsers. That includes various versions of IE. I find that web sites are getting worse. Some only work in IE, some don't. Some insist on FF / Chrome, some fail in one of those. Some give very different behaviour in different browsers. My presumption is that a fair number of developers are not working cross browser from the start. Maybe they've become used to "apps" so expect things not to be usable on many platforms. Pity they don't integrate decent web checking into their work flow!
I see Opera recently decided to drop development of their own browser engine and have adopted WebKit. The game is narrowing further!
Last edited by MikeGale on Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Albert Wiersch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3785
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
- Location: Near Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Re: Which web browser is best?
MikeGale wrote:
- Chrome "phones home" more than I'd like. (Trace the conversation over HTTP, from it, and you can see what I mean.
I haven't read much about this, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. I've kind of just accepted the fact that I'm being tracked in various ways.
MikeGale wrote:I continue to use a variety of browsers.
Me too. You never know when you're going to run into a site that has issues with one browser... and of course I need them for testing.
MikeGale wrote:I find that web sites are getting worse. Some only work in IE, some don't. Some insist of FF / Chrome, some fail in one of those.
I think that is unfortunate but not unexpected. The more complex a site is, the more likely it's not going to work on one or more browsers, or work poorly (like have bugs).
MikeGale wrote:Pity they don't integrate decent web checking into their work flow!
That would definitely help solve some issues. My guess is that sometimes when a developer tries a validator (usually the W3C validator) then
1) it throws up a bunch of issues but they just don't want to spend the time to fix things because it "works" in the browser(s) they quickly (but not thoroughly) tested it in, or
2) the validator throws up issues that they know they want to ignore or disregard and so it makes the validation more of a pain and hassle than a help. CSE HTML Validator tries to resolve this issue by being more practical as well as configurable so developers can eliminate many validator messages that "get in the way" and concentrate only on the more serious issues - but developers actually have to spend (and have) the time to figure this out - or be required to do it by their boss or the law (like for government websites).
MikeGale wrote:I see Opera recently decided to drop development of their own browser engine and have adopted WebKit. The game is narrowing further!
Yes, another interesting development. It has to be an immense amount of work to make and maintain a browser engine these days - considering how large and complicated HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and other web technologies then need to support are these days. On top of that, it has to be rather hard to support that development with funding, considering how good the free browsers are. Google and Microsoft and Apple clearly have a lot of resources, but I don't see how smaller companies with fewer resources can justify supporting substantial software development endeavors for another free web browser.
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial
- MikeGale
- Rank VI - Professional
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
Re: Which web browser is best?
From time to time I try other validators. Like the W3C.My guess is that sometimes when a developer tries a validator (usually the W3C validator) then...
When I look at their results I realise that helping developers doesn't seem to be the core aim. They are instead taking a pedantic view of adherence to standards without thought of whether each standard makes sense or is useful to each developer.
Long story short, the information typically isn't useful enough to the developer.
As you say the developer (my view) needs to figure this out for himself. Developers who don't do this are, in some sense, incomplete.
I suspect that a lot of people are only aware of the less functional validators. One thing is for sure, I've seen them, and only them, integrated into a lot of software packages (presumably by people who haven't themselves learned to get it right). This wide, and misleading, visibility has, I'm sure, convinced many competent, thinking developers to give up on validation. (To the detriment of the web.)
Last edited by MikeGale on Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Albert Wiersch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3785
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
- Location: Near Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Re: Which web browser is best?
Exactly! I suspect most developers are interested in "real-world" or "practical" results. I know there are some who just have to stick with the standards (many in academia?), but that has its own drawbacks as well, probably more so than taking a "real-world" approach (as long as one is developing for the "real-world"). Don't get me wrong, standards definitely have value, but so does being able to cope & deal with real-world issues that might involve a little bending or contorting of the standards.MikeGale wrote:When I look at their results I realise that helping developers doesn't seem to the core aim. They are instead taking a pedantic view of adherence to standards without thought of whether each standard makes sense or is useful to each developer.
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial
- MikeGale
- Rank VI - Professional
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
Re: Which web browser is best?
I'm surprised when I hear talk of standards being just about the only thing. Browsers to some degree do their own thing, within limits, this is good. Great design comes from coherent thinking, trying things out etc. Committees and approval organisations stifle and actively prevent doing the right thing, all too often. So I believe that limited exploration is a good thing.
At root the standards may not reflect what happens in reality and are insufficient to be a single indication of what to do. That means developers need to do some thinking, which is great. It also means that any developer who thinks that standards are just about the only thing, doesn't understand as much as he could, or maybe should.
On the browser as spyware issue, I saw a survey result. About two thirds of users had a high dislike. I imagine most haven't taken a look, for themselves. If they did I wonder what would change.
At root the standards may not reflect what happens in reality and are insufficient to be a single indication of what to do. That means developers need to do some thinking, which is great. It also means that any developer who thinks that standards are just about the only thing, doesn't understand as much as he could, or maybe should.
On the browser as spyware issue, I saw a survey result. About two thirds of users had a high dislike. I imagine most haven't taken a look, for themselves. If they did I wonder what would change.
Last edited by MikeGale on Thu May 30, 2013 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Which web browser is best?
I agree standard are great, but why should I give away - block - any segment of my potential audience because some popular browser doesn't implement the standards in a way similar to others?
The objective is effective communication. To that end it makes no differences whether I don't follow the standards or the browser implementer didn't. If my message is not conveyed, I loose not the arbiters of standards.
The objective is effective communication. To that end it makes no differences whether I don't follow the standards or the browser implementer didn't. If my message is not conveyed, I loose not the arbiters of standards.
Lou
Say what you will about Sisyphus. He always has work.
Say what you will about Sisyphus. He always has work.
Re: Which web browser is best?
chrome, hands down.
One word: fast...
One word: fast...
Last edited by gingir on Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:54 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Rank 0 - Newcomer
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:38 am
- Contact:
Re: Which web browser is best?
yeah,it is well know that firefox is always favorite one.
Re: Which web browser is best?
Hello!
I'm newly registered in this community and I'm glad to be here. Well I have two browsers, Chrome and Firefox. But I like even more Firefox. It's quite pretty good.
I'm newly registered in this community and I'm glad to be here. Well I have two browsers, Chrome and Firefox. But I like even more Firefox. It's quite pretty good.
Re: Which web browser is best?
I'm used to using Firefox and if something happens and it doesn't cooperate then I switch to Safari usually
Re: Which web browser is best?
I've been back and forth with Chrome and Firefox....each browser has it's pros and cons really. I think Firefox is the best one though, it loads pages faster and is more reliable. In general, hardly any problems with Firefox
Re: Which web browser is best?
for me 1. Chrome, 2. IE, 3. Opera, Safari, Firefox
- Albert Wiersch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3785
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:23 am
- Location: Near Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Re: Which web browser is best?
Well, it's over a year now and I have to say Chrome is now my favorite browser, although the recent Firefox GUI change was a nice plus.
I also recently found an add-on called "ScriptSafe" that I really like. It's amazing how bloated some web pages are that they have to load scripts from so many different domains. With ScriptSafe, you can stop it from loading some of the "junk". It can help make some bloated pages faster.
And AdBlock is another "must have" extension. I also use "Flash Block".
I've attached a screenshot of ScriptSafe showing how many scripts a bloated local news site is trying to load when I visit their page. I've only allowed the ones I think are important.
I also recently found an add-on called "ScriptSafe" that I really like. It's amazing how bloated some web pages are that they have to load scripts from so many different domains. With ScriptSafe, you can stop it from loading some of the "junk". It can help make some bloated pages faster.
And AdBlock is another "must have" extension. I also use "Flash Block".
I've attached a screenshot of ScriptSafe showing how many scripts a bloated local news site is trying to load when I visit their page. I've only allowed the ones I think are important.
- Attachments
-
- ScriptSafe.png (84.92 KiB) Viewed 15762 times
Albert Wiersch, CSS HTML Validator Developer • Download CSS HTML Validator FREE Trial