Search found 10 matches
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:28 am
- Forum: HTML and XHTML
- Topic: Use of HTML5
- Replies: 12
- Views: 19576
Re: Use of HTML5
On that note, if there is anything specific you want improved in CSE HTML Validator , then please post it to another topic in the appropriate CSE HTML Validator forum with as much detail as you can provide and I would be happy to see if the output or checking could be improved. :D Thanks! :mrgreen:...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:46 pm
- Forum: HTML and XHTML
- Topic: Use of HTML5
- Replies: 12
- Views: 19576
Re: Use of HTML5
EDIT: The post to which I'm replying seems to have changed a bit, since I originally posted this. It originally said that I had HTML5 backward. Yeah sorry I was attempting to make the rant as short as possible. I increasingly find sites that simply don't work in one of the browsers. This is not som...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:02 am
- Forum: HTML and XHTML
- Topic: Use of HTML5
- Replies: 12
- Views: 19576
Re: Use of HTML5
I have the impression that significant pieces of the web are becoming unusabale to some browsers. I think there's a wave of web developers who only develop for their preferred browser AND have convinced big companies to use their talents. HTML5 does more than just extend older versions with new fea...
- Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:53 pm
- Forum: HTML and XHTML
- Topic: HTML 5 is dead?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 37309
Re: HTML 5 is dead?
Mary it technically right in that all current browsers have reduced their parsing/rendering modes to just HTML5 and XHTML. If you're using some older version of HTML then you're really just using a subset of HTML5 as far as the browser is concerned. This is quite nice because as a side effect you ge...
- Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:54 am
- Forum: General Web Development
- Topic: Is this a big shift in search
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8417
Re: Is this a big shift in search
I've come to the conclusion that a search engine that I pay for, that I control to some degree, and where I have meaningful control over the algorithm is the answer. The only way you're likely to get that kind of control is via engines that support SPARQL. I like http://sindice.com/ + http://sig.ma...
- Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:34 am
- Forum: General Web Development
- Topic: AsciiDoc a way to generate XHTML and other things
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6398
- Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:20 am
- Forum: BETA Talk
- Topic: Ignoring CSS Hacks for IE 6 & 7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6277
Re: Ignoring CSS Hacks for IE 6 & 7
Some "real world" examples from the widely-used YUI CSS resets: http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.3.0/build/cssreset/reset.css /*to enable resizing for IE*/ input, textarea, select { *font-size:100%; } http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.3.0/build/cssbase/base.css /* setting a consistent width, 160px; control of ty...
- Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:50 pm
- Forum: HTML and XHTML
- Topic: HTML Tidy
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11513
Re: HTML Tidy
It's a little old and not so maintained. Also huge with lots of options. It's nice for transforming a big mess into something resembling (x)html so you can finish the job with sed / some editor. If you happen to be a Vim user have a look at :h makeprg and :h equalprg for filtering a buffer through t...
- Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:01 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: XHTML5
- Replies: 19
- Views: 21544
Re: XHTML5
1) Previous versions of markup need a declaration. Why break the chain? Sort of. There's no denying that XHTML 1.1 conformance requirements call the DOCTYPE a "MUST", and If a document really does validate (in the true XML sense), then I'm all for making that assertion by referencing the formal def...
- Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:21 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: XHTML5
- Replies: 19
- Views: 21544
Re: XHTML5
Mike, there isn't a doctype specifically for XHTML5. Some sites mention that the doctype can be omitted for XHTML, while others such as Wikipedia state that <!DOCTYOE html> (case sensitive) should keep XHTML folks happy. Correct, a doctype isn't required in an XHTML5 document. Just to clarify - as ...