CSS HTML Validator Support

I've installed the tool that integrates CSE into Firefox. It installed with Lite when I have both Lite and Professional installed. (That suits me at present as I want to know what the general public might see.) How do I most easily (no installation gymnastics) switch the linkage to another version o...

There are things that Tidy seems unable to do. (I last ran through it some time ago, I've done this maybe 4 times over the life of tidy, I've spent a few hours, so I'm pretty sure.) My conclusion is that tidy settings interact with each other and that at least one setting changes two different thing...

Short Description: I have both CSE and CSE Lite installed (both latest). The both have registry entries (Hive...Classes...) for .htm which appear correct (...shell/edit/command...). ONLY CSE Professional shows in the Edit list from the IE toolbar. How do I also make Lite appear there? Background Des...

Hi Albert, Thanks for that. At present I suspect most users are happy with the standard packaged functionality. I can see feeds being part of a wider structure, which differs between publishers. Demand would be higher, in that world. (A lot of bloggers have never published before and are delighted w...

I've currently dropped using a tool to generate RSS. I'm finding it hard inspecting by eye. I've seen other people asking about an RSS checker.

Are there any plans to incorporate a feed checker in future?

Hi,

I generally try to steer clear of interop. The automated tools assume an interface with IDispatch etc. There are other ways to use DLL's, but I'm not going to explore that immediately.

I was hoping for work already done.

The standard interfaces look like the immediate answer.

Thanks very much. 1) Programming programexport. I have had another look . With that page and the code I can do what I want. (I was hoping for a lazy man's way to see what variables are in scope at some point in code.) 3) See email. 5) I was looking for some accessibility messages which (I guess) are...

I spent a few minutes with the type library export tool (in .NET) it didn't recognise the DLL. Worth the effort though.

Hi Albert, Time is the critical thing (for fixing markup). If you're going to XHTML there is a fair amount of code out there (I've only had a look at some .NET and Java material, but I'm sure there's more than that). Even with that it can take time to implement exactly what you need. If you're gener...

Thanks for that.

My intuitive expectation was that markup is parsed the same whether commented or not. (I've switched off spell checking within comments.)

I see there is documentation for using the CSE DLL from C and there is a COM wrapper.

Has anyone produced a .NET interop assembly?

(I'm most interested in an official PIA, Primary Interop Assembly, rather than a no name brand assembly.)

I tested a page (integrated browser) and got a spurious spelling error. This originated in a commented out section which structurally is like: <!-- <div id="DE52b56055-92fc-4e7a-9967-58bd3204e5d1" class="IdentifiedAsSpellingError"><h3>Processing</h3></div> --> The spell checker identified each insta...

The tidy integration is clean and compact . Not that I'm a big fan of tidy. When you use it with all the config parameters you soon discover it's incapable of doing some things. In my (brief) tests it introduced a warning, changed a content-type and inserted a horrible meta - generator tag! For me i...

To me CSE is part of a bigger process that might involve unit and integration tests. ( MBUnit or NUnit etc.) Are any people here integrating CSE output into their testing? (This will often not be unit testing but more like integration testing.) If so how are you doing it? How could it be improved?

I have tools going back years that make my life more productive. This is code that I can invoke from editing environments to do things for me. Two examples 1) I have script code which takes raw industry specific text and expands abbreviations at the push of a button. The version I use in Homesite is...